Improves readability and maintainability of project documentation by standardizing formatting, reorganizing sections, and aligning contribution and archive entry guidelines. Enhances link formatting, summary placement, and neutral language usage to ensure clarity for contributors and users.
Updates project references to use the consistent owner/repo naming pattern, improving clarity and accuracy across the curated list. Enhances discoverability and aligns with common GitHub conventions.
Expands the curated collection of controversial GitHub events with concise, informative summaries for each entry. Improves clarity, historical context, and discoverability by elaborating on key incidents, technical debates, and community reactions across a wide range of open source projects.
- Remove summaries that reference politically sensitive topics like racism/gender. Even though they are reasonably neutral, i want to avoid incuding these, to reduce risk of reports
- Remove summaries that are too short and do not sufficiently describe the contents of the drama. In some cases there're a lot of technical details and it's better to have no summary than to have too low-informative misleading summary
- Remove mention of drama participant's real name
- Change wording to more neutral
- Rearrange text to be more readable and present events in chronological order