From f669e6c80288965cc90767a6bab6b1029fd6f908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:56:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20vs.=20ABP:=20efficiency?= =?UTF-8?q?=20compared=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md index 849f569..93ed946 100644 --- a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md +++ b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Below are the average time it takes for each extension to handle a net request i ##### µBlock ![uBlock](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/ublock-obr.png) -Fun fact: µBlock will actually execute more efficiently if you enable _ hpHosts’s Ad and tracking servers_, the timing of `chrome.webRequest.onBeforeRequest` goes below 185 ms when this list is enabled. The key is that filters made of plain hostnames are processed in a very efficient way in µBlock. +Fun fact: µBlock will actually execute more efficiently if you enable _ hpHosts’s Ad and tracking servers_, the timing of `chrome.webRequest.onBeforeRequest` goes below 185 ms when this list is enabled. The key is that filters made of plain hostnames are processed in a very efficient way in µBlock. The list is not enabled out-of-the-box, because I have no idea what is the breakage level o web sites with this list. Breaking web sites is acceptable in [HTTP Switchboard](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard#http-switchboard-for-chromium), but less so in a generic blocker. ### Added memory footprint to web pages