diff --git "a/Reference-answer-to-claims-such-as-\"uBlock-is-inferior-in-capabilities-as-a-result-of-being-lighter-on-the-browser\".md" "b/About-\"uBlock-is-inferior-in-capabilities-as-a-result-of-being-lighter-on-the-browser\"....md"
similarity index 99%
rename from "Reference-answer-to-claims-such-as-\"uBlock-is-inferior-in-capabilities-as-a-result-of-being-lighter-on-the-browser\".md"
rename to "About-\"uBlock-is-inferior-in-capabilities-as-a-result-of-being-lighter-on-the-browser\"....md"
index 9f33416..124ba06 100644
--- "a/Reference-answer-to-claims-such-as-\"uBlock-is-inferior-in-capabilities-as-a-result-of-being-lighter-on-the-browser\".md"
+++ "b/About-\"uBlock-is-inferior-in-capabilities-as-a-result-of-being-lighter-on-the-browser\"....md"
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ Motivation for creating this page, this comment made in the spirit of _Fake News
 
 There is nothing wrong with preferring ABP to uBO. There is however something wrong when someone engages in misinformation regarding uBO because of their preference for ABP.
 
+This is my reference answer to such claims.
+
 uBlock Origin is lighter on the browser because of many choices which were made regarding how the filtering engine is designed internally. A coarse enumeration of these choices are:
 - lean in-memory filter representation
 - plain string comparisons instead of regular expressions wherever possible