From ed706261ece49f7ef459a285aa6798c549419e28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gorhill Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:23:30 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20vs.=20ABP:=20efficiency?= =?UTF-8?q?=20compared=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/µBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared.md b/µBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared.md index f731701..24b910a 100644 --- a/µBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared.md +++ b/µBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Here is a quick illustrated comparison of efficiency using various angles. Each - [Added memory footprint to web pages](#added-memory-footprint-to-web-pages) - [Added CPU overhead to web pages](#added-cpu-overhead-to-web-pages) -By the way, I need dispel a myth given how often it surfaces: [Adblock Edge uses Adblock Plus filtering engine](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/abp-abe.png), so it is **not** more efficient as ABP. +By the way, I need to dispel a silly myth given how often it surfaces: [Adblock Edge uses Adblock Plus filtering engine](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/abp-abe.png), so it is **not** more efficient as ABP. ### Own memory footprint