From ec34ddd15c6d8b3fd89a9f7ffb42c2cb96639d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:53:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] remove screenshot of vim test: the issue is back for ABP: see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1320872 --- Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint.md | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint.md b/Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint.md index e430f7a..03f4d75 100644 --- a/Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint.md +++ b/Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint.md @@ -1,9 +1,5 @@ **Note:** Results have been updated with latest Firefox 41 and Chromium 45. The page is the same as the old one (Firefox 35/Chromium 39, [archived here](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint-(2015-03-07))), except all figures have been updated using latest browser versions. -*** - -[![Vim test](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/vim-test-abp-vs-ublock.png)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/vim-test-abp-vs-ublock.png)
Infamous VIM test: ABP 370 MB vs. uBlock 373 MB. Firefox 41 64-bit. On Chromium-based browsers, ABP still suffers memory footprint issues from injecting a huge stylesheet in each page and in each embedded frames on a page. - #### Setup 1. Ensure the blocker is the only active extension (to avoid results to be polluted by other extensions)