From e388126b2effedeb2aefb005db0fdb02fa853143 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:07:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20and=20others:=20Blockin?= =?UTF-8?q?g=20ads,=20trackers,=20malwares=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md b/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md index 360e9f4..9025e6a 100644 --- a/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md +++ b/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -New [reference benchmark](/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Reference-benchmark). +New [reference benchmark](/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Reference-benchmark). [2014-07-21: For the record, I have ideas on how to improve the privacy-wise usefulness of the figures collated in this benchmark. So I plan to make the next run much better at gauging privacy exposure. The idea is to count the total number of **distinct pairs 1st-party/3rd-party**. This is a much better measure than the one currently used, though the one currently used is better than whatever I have seen elsewhere.] This benchmark is to measure privacy exposure, by counting the number of **distinct 3rd-party domains** which have been hit by net requests during the benchmark. The lower the number of distinct 3rd-party domains hit, the better.