From d49aeac616aab0906ef7e5c58a772d2d16a3ff3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:17:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20Does=20=C2=B5Block=20blocks=20ads=20o?= =?UTF-8?q?r=20just=20hide=20them=3F=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md b/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md index 878c970..33d2acf 100644 --- a/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md +++ b/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ I've seen an increase in misrepresentation and disinformation lately regarding I will set the official record here. -First, let's just say µBlock is a real threat to Adblock Plus owner's business model, Eyeo GmbH, and to those [who paid Eyeo GmbH](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/02/google_amazon_taboola_microsoft_adplock_plus_unblock/) to be part of the "acceptable ads" marketing campaign. It is also a threat to other big-name blockers as well. +First, let's just say µBlock is a real threat to Adblock Plus owner's business model, Eyeo GmbH, and to those [who paid Eyeo GmbH](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/02/google_amazon_taboola_microsoft_adplock_plus_unblock/) to be part of the "acceptable ads" marketing campaign. It is also a threat to other big-name blockers as well. Add to this [not everybody](https://forums.lanik.us/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=17842) [is pleased](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/564) with µBlock enabling _EasyPrivacy_ by default. There seems to be underhanded attempts to discredit µBlock lately in various venues. Here is a typical comment: