diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md
index d210a78..4eb6f78 100644
--- a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md
+++ b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md
@@ -1,5 +1,19 @@
+Here is a quick illustrated comparison of efficiency using various angles.
+
 ### Own memory footprint
 
+These screenshots show the memory footprint of ABP and µBlock _after_ they have gone through this rather [demanding benchmark](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Reference-benchmark). Once the benchmark was completed, I forced the browser to garbage collect the memory in each extension by clicking the trash icon a couple of times -- this is an _important step_, or else the shown memory footprint is not too reliable.
+
+##### Adblock Plus
+![ABP](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/abp-own-mem.png)
+
+##### µBlock
+![uBlock](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/ublock-own-mem.png)
+
+Both extensions had _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's Ad Server_ list, and malware protection (there are more filters in µBlock for this last one).
+
+####
+
 ### Added overhead to each net request
 
 ### Added memory footprint to web pages
\ No newline at end of file