From d1b8a45b48b7bd239c821192d168e8630bd11e09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: SW1FT Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:24:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Dynamic filtering: quick guide (markdown) --- Dynamic-filtering:-quick-guide.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Dynamic-filtering:-quick-guide.md b/Dynamic-filtering:-quick-guide.md index e5ca6fa..3355ed8 100644 --- a/Dynamic-filtering:-quick-guide.md +++ b/Dynamic-filtering:-quick-guide.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ As you can see, you can create dynamic filtering rules for object types, or host The color of an entry indicate whether all requests were blocked (reddish), all requests were allowed (greenish), or some were blocked some were allowed (yellowish). -In bold, domain names. Domain names are hostnames, but hostnames are not necessarily domain names from µBlock's point of view: domain names are extracted as per [Mozilla Public Suffix list](https://publicsuffix.org/). +In bold, domain names. Domain names are hostnames, but hostnames are not necessarily domain names from uBlock's point of view: domain names are extracted as per [Mozilla Public Suffix list](https://publicsuffix.org/). **Second column**: **_global_** dynamic filtering rules, i.e. whatever rule appears in this column applies everywhere, on _all_ sites: @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ We covered the _block_ and _noop_ dynamic filtering rules. What about the _allow The dynamic filtering _allow_ rule is most useful to un-break sites broken by some static filters. -[Someone found out](https://twitter.com/r3volution11/status/549584186320117760) Boldchat site was broken when using µBlock: +[Someone found out](https://twitter.com/r3volution11/status/549584186320117760) Boldchat site was broken when using uBlock: ![figure 10](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/df-qg-10.png)