prehistoric-systems/uBlock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git synced 2026-03-11 09:04:36 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Updated My answer to web store reviews where appropriate (markdown)

Raymond Hill 2015-04-11 10:35:10 -04:00
parent 71cc2f4514
commit c6f80e11fc
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
My-answer-to-web-store-reviews-where-appropriate.md

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Problem with _about:addons-memory_ is that it doesn't show all the memory used b
Still, taking this into account, uBlock has a smaller memory footprint than ABP, even when using many more filter lists (something else to take into account).
But the biggest problem with this user's conclusion is that he doesn't take into account the [contributed memory footprint to web pages](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint). This is where ABP suffers the most. ABP will inject 14,000+ CSS rules into every page and into every `iframe` on a page. The count can easily reach 21,000+ CSS rules if using more than just EasyList. On the other hand, uBlock will typically inject from none to a handful of CSS rules.
But the biggest problem with this user's conclusion is that he doesn't take into account the [contributed memory footprint to web pages](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Firefox-version:-benchmarking-memory-footprint). This is where ABP [suffers the most](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=988266#c6). ABP will inject 14,000+ CSS rules into every page and into every `iframe` on a page. The count can easily reach 21,000+ CSS rules if using more than just EasyList. On the other hand, uBlock will typically inject from none to a handful of CSS rules.
***