From c6981a1e1f3a7ca34b56a0efbc4bb8ce56396213 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:31:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20About=20Wladimir=20Palant's=20answer?= =?UTF-8?q?=20to=20"What=20do=20you=20think=20of=20=C2=B5Block=3F"=20(mark?= =?UTF-8?q?down)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- ...imir-Palant's-answer-to-\"What-do-you-think-of-µBlock?\".md" | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git "a/About-Wladimir-Palant's-answer-to-\"What-do-you-think-of-µBlock?\".md" "b/About-Wladimir-Palant's-answer-to-\"What-do-you-think-of-µBlock?\".md" index 893a143..7af8193 100644 --- "a/About-Wladimir-Palant's-answer-to-\"What-do-you-think-of-µBlock?\".md" +++ "b/About-Wladimir-Palant's-answer-to-\"What-do-you-think-of-µBlock?\".md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ This has been a pattern with Wladimir Palant with regard to my work. [Outright m - What "proposals" is he specifically referring to? - What specific "scenarios" is he referring to? -Conveniently for him, I just don't know how to comment specifically whatever technical aspects in response to vague statements. How does one do that? +Conveniently for him, I just don't know how to comment specifically whatever technical aspects in response to his vague statements. How does one do that? Also, nowhere in the code did I trade _"performance for memory use"_, both memory use and CPU use have always been of highest concern. Given that my [benchmarks](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/%C2%B5Block-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared) show µBlock does _significantly_ better than ABP on both memory and CPU count, vaguely stating that _"clear tendency to trade performance for memory use"_ is just plain nonsense.