diff --git a/Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares:-µBlock-vs.-others.md b/Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares:-µBlock-vs.-others.md
index 5b6f490..33038eb 100644
--- a/Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares:-µBlock-vs.-others.md
+++ b/Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares:-µBlock-vs.-others.md
@@ -55,11 +55,17 @@ The figures show the number of requests **allowed**, thus lower numbers are bett
 The point is to show how many 3rd-party servers are hit on average after running 
 the reference benchmark (three repeats in the current instance).
 
-The less hits on 3rd-party servers, the better. All blockers were configured 
-in such a way as to compare apples-vs-apples:
+The less hits on 3rd-party servers, the better.
+
+#### Methodology
+
+All blockers were configured in such a way as to compare apples-vs-apples:
 
 - **µBlock:** out-of-the-box settings -- no change.
 - **Adblock Plus:** _"EasyPrivacy"_, _"Malware Domains"_ checked. _"Acceptable ads"_ unchecked.
 - **Ghostery:** _"Advertising"_, _"Analytics"_, _"Beacons"_, _"Privacy"_ checked. _"Widgets"_ not checked. _"GhostRank"_ unchecked. 
 - **Adguard:** _"Spyware and tracking"_, _"Phishing and malware protection"_ checked. _"Social media"_ not checked. _"Acceptable ads"_ unchecked.
 - **Disconnect:** out-of-the-box settings -- no change.
+
+[Sessbench](https://github.com/gorhill/sessbench) was used ti run the benchmarks, and each extension was tested as the only extension
+active in the browser.
\ No newline at end of file