From bb6bc035d1f75c378abc4d2933a3d4bfd417b9f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:18:04 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20vs.=20others:=20Blockin?= =?UTF-8?q?g=20ads,=20trackers,=20malwares=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md b/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md index f206f70..5afe91c 100644 --- a/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md +++ b/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md @@ -72,5 +72,5 @@ and each extension was tested as the only extension active in the browser. **Note regarding the methodology:** It has been said that I was unfair toward ABP because I didn't use [Peter Lowe’s Ad server](http://pgl.yoyo.org/) list for ABP while I did for µBlock. It is -true that I could have installed the list, which most certainly account for the difference +true that I could have imported the list into ABP, which most certainly account for the difference between ABP and µBlock. My answer to this is available at [Wilders Security Fourm](http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/%C2%B5block-a-lean-and-fast-blocker.365273/page-3#post-2386023). \ No newline at end of file