From b76248687f59143832810c7c86d39d1bc6cd0560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anewuser Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 01:09:51 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] one of the developer -> one of the developers --- Maintainership-transfer-of-uBlock:-post-mortem.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Maintainership-transfer-of-uBlock:-post-mortem.md b/Maintainership-transfer-of-uBlock:-post-mortem.md index f2fab07..0c09a5e 100644 --- a/Maintainership-transfer-of-uBlock:-post-mortem.md +++ b/Maintainership-transfer-of-uBlock:-post-mortem.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ On April 1st, when I transferred **maintainership** of uBlock[1], as far as I am concerned, I was transferring to the [The uBlock Development Team](https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/commit/50e621d4ee46479b40e36319cbab68985d7527a5). In practice, of course I had to transfer to one of the member of the [The uBlock Development Team](https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/commit/50e621d4ee46479b40e36319cbab68985d7527a5), which happened to be @chrisaljoudi. -Things did not turn out as expected. A few days afterward, I learned that @chrisaljoudi had proceeded to _immediately_ misrepresent (and still does as of April 24th) the project on [his home page](https://chrismatic.io/ublock/) with _"made [...] by Chris"_. uBlock is _not_ made by @chrisaljoudi, it is made by [The uBlock Development Team](https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/commit/50e621d4ee46479b40e36319cbab68985d7527a5)[2], of which @chrisaljoudi was one of the developer[3]. This misrepresentation is made worst by the fact that it was coupled with a plea for donations.[4] +Things did not turn out as expected. A few days afterward, I learned that @chrisaljoudi had proceeded to _immediately_ misrepresent (and still does as of April 24th) the project on [his home page](https://chrismatic.io/ublock/) with _"made [...] by Chris"_. uBlock is _not_ made by @chrisaljoudi, it is made by [The uBlock Development Team](https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/commit/50e621d4ee46479b40e36319cbab68985d7527a5)[2], of which @chrisaljoudi was one of the developers[3]. This misrepresentation is made worst by the fact that it was coupled with a plea for donations.[4] I have nothing against developers asking for donations for writing free and open source software, this is very common and there is nothing wrong with this. It's a personal choice. However, I don't tolerate too well misrepresentation in order to financially benefit from the work of others, which I now conclude is the case here -- there is so much assumption of good faith one can give.