From b0ad9195d835b044b54b7395e101a4598db7eab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raymond Hill <gorhill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:54:09 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Updated Inline script tag filtering (markdown)

---
 Inline-script-tag-filtering.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
index 32fb27c..6f6a3af 100644
--- a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
+++ b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Whatever can't be blocked using a network request filter can be taken care by a
 
 #### Does Adblock Plus support this filter syntax?
 
-No. And apparently, [they won't](https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/748#comment:9):
+No. And apparently, [they won't](https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/748):
 
 > Not quite the same thing - he is "blocking" individual scripts (something that inevitably causes a massive performance overhead). Not that it is significantly more useful as a result, anti-adblock messages can easily be combined with required website functionality in the same <script> tag. They won't do that for a small extension like uBlock but they will definitely do it if we implement something like that.