diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md b/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md
index d67f8ab..c414a7d 100644
--- a/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md
+++ b/µBlock-vs.-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md
@@ -67,5 +67,10 @@ All blockers were configured in such a way as to compare apples-vs-apples:
 - **Adguard:** _"Spyware and tracking"_, _"Phishing and malware protection"_ checked. _"Social media"_ not checked. _"Acceptable ads"_ unchecked.
 - **Disconnect:** out-of-the-box settings -- no change.
 
-[Sessbench](https://github.com/gorhill/sessbench) was used to run the benchmarks, and each extension was tested as the only extension
-active in the browser.
\ No newline at end of file
+[Sessbench](https://github.com/gorhill/sessbench) was used to run the benchmarks, 
+and each extension was tested as the only extension active in the browser.
+
+Note regarding the methodology: It has been said that I was unfair toward ABP because I didn't
+use [Peter Lowe’s Ad server](http://pgl.yoyo.org/) list for ABP while I did for µBlock. It is
+true that I could have installed the list, which most certainly account for the difference
+between ABP and µBlock. My answer to this is available at [Wilders Security Fourm](http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/%C2%B5block-a-lean-and-fast-blocker.365273/page-3#post-2386023).
\ No newline at end of file