From aba246517c25b393bb66462bc9b974e667419cd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Aljoudi Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:40:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20vs.=20ABP:=20efficiency?= =?UTF-8?q?=20compared=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md index 910d2f5..a346a6a 100644 --- a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md +++ b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Here is a quick illustrated comparison of efficiency using various angles. Each - [Added memory footprint to web pages](#added-memory-footprint-to-web-pages) - [Added CPU overhead to web pages](#added-cpu-overhead-to-web-pages) -By the way, I need to dispel a silly myth given how often it surfaces: [Adblock Edge uses Adblock Plus filtering engine](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/abp-abe.png), so it is **not** more efficient as ABP. +By the way, I need to dispel a silly myth given how often it surfaces: [Adblock Edge uses Adblock Plus filtering engine](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/abp-abe.png), so it is **not** more efficient than ABP. ### Own memory footprint