From ab5a880b7e84834643c96d6bd97fc87912f0c46c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 04:44:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20and=20others:=20Blockin?= =?UTF-8?q?g=20ads,=20trackers,=20malwares=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md b/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md index cd7b0f3..25ab49e 100644 --- a/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md +++ b/µBlock-and-others:-Blocking-ads,-trackers,-malwares.md @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Measuring directly the number of distinct 3rd-party domains which were hit is a Caveat: "3rd-party" is defined as a domain which doesn't match the domain of the web page. For sure many domains reported as "3rd-party" actually belong to the same entity which owns the page domain (for example, `yimg.com` is owned by `yahoo.com`). There is no way for the benchmark code to know this, unless using a comprehensive database of who owns which domain -- that is beyond my means. Still, the benchmark is useful if comparing blockers among themselves, or against when no blocker is used. -Results -- figures are "**3rd party** / all". Ordered from least 3rd-party hits to most 3rd-party hits. Privacy-wise, lower numbers are better. +Results -- figures are "3rd party / all". Ordered from least 3rd-party hits to most 3rd-party hits. Privacy-wise, lower numbers are better. #### µBlock 0.2.3.3