From aa2bc8c3e23ac67dc8fe9a66874f89d35af425a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 15:59:30 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Quick guide: popup user interface (markdown) --- Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md b/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md index 4d1265b..9ec4f63 100644 --- a/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md +++ b/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md @@ -98,4 +98,10 @@ In the end the chosen solution is to now have web page themselves subject to fil In the figure above, a user will be given the choice to go back or proceed to the web page which was blocked. If the user choose to proceed, web pages from the site will be temporary allowed for a limited time (currently set at 60s). -If the user disagree that a web page should be blocked (because of a false positive for example), then turning off _strict blocking_ for the site will prevent web pages for the site from being blocked by uBlock in the future, i.e. the site will behave as per ABP-filtering semantic, just like with uBlock pre-0.9.3.0. \ No newline at end of file +If the user disagree that a web page should be blocked (because of a false positive for example), then turning off _strict blocking_ for the site... + +![Popup UI](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/popup-1h.png) + +... will prevent web pages for the site from being blocked by uBlock in the future, i.e. the site will behave as per ABP-filtering semantic, and just like with uBlock pre-0.9.3.0. + +There are many benefits to strict blocking. For example, there is no good reason one should want to connect _at all_ to any of the site present in any one of the malware domain lists. Strict blocking will prevent this from happening. \ No newline at end of file