From 9dd0cb29ac03a4f9d91925cfc87d2513e0f140ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: krystian3w <35370833+krystian3w@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:28:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] recover image form commit ~fb2da45 --- ...bout-efficiency,-I-have-8-GB-RAM-and|or-a-quad-core-CPU.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Who-cares-about-efficiency,-I-have-8-GB-RAM-and|or-a-quad-core-CPU.md b/Who-cares-about-efficiency,-I-have-8-GB-RAM-and|or-a-quad-core-CPU.md index 317075d..b6d3e00 100644 --- a/Who-cares-about-efficiency,-I-have-8-GB-RAM-and|or-a-quad-core-CPU.md +++ b/Who-cares-about-efficiency,-I-have-8-GB-RAM-and|or-a-quad-core-CPU.md @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Not convinced yet? Try using a stopwatch to compare how fast web pages load when If you have a multi-core CPU with plenty of spare CPU cycles, you may not notice a difference in page load. Other popular blockers will use any available CPU cycles (see below) to perform the same job as uBO. CPU overhead
-![CPU overhead](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/cpu-usage-overall-chart-20141226.png) +![CPU overhead](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/6c046ed95cd02d023453c66f766159f6410ae7f7/doc/benchmarks/cpu-usage-overall-chart-20141226.png) Memory footprint
-![Memory overhead](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-overall-chart-20141224.png) \ No newline at end of file +![Memory overhead](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/6c046ed95cd02d023453c66f766159f6410ae7f7/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-overall-chart-20141224.png) \ No newline at end of file