From 9bd3d61296a250865054faa205b6a96f10ceef67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:03:26 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20Does=20=C2=B5Block=20blocks=20ads=20o?= =?UTF-8?q?r=20just=20hide=20them=3F=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md b/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md index 53c7135..878c970 100644 --- a/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md +++ b/Does-µBlock-blocks-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ I've seen an increase in misrepresentation and disinformation lately regarding I will set the official record here. -First, let's just say µBlock is a real threat to Adblock Plus owner's business model, Eyeo GmbH, and to those [who paid Eyeo GmbH](http://9to5google.com/2015/02/02/google-along-with-amazon-microsoft-reportedly-paying-adblock-to-unblock-ads/) to be part of the "acceptable ads" marketing campaign. It is also a threat to other big-name blockers as well. +First, let's just say µBlock is a real threat to Adblock Plus owner's business model, Eyeo GmbH, and to those [who paid Eyeo GmbH](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/02/google_amazon_taboola_microsoft_adplock_plus_unblock/) to be part of the "acceptable ads" marketing campaign. It is also a threat to other big-name blockers as well. There seems to be underhanded attempts to discredit µBlock lately in various venues. Here is a typical comment: