From 93b570c1b179a6e63ef3e5aba0c696bc3420c5c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:02:21 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20Does=20=C2=B5Block=20block=20ads=20or?= =?UTF-8?q?=20just=20hide=20them=3F=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Does-µBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Does-µBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md b/Does-µBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md index a26bd79..76534f7 100644 --- a/Does-µBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md +++ b/Does-µBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them?.md @@ -50,4 +50,6 @@ Yet, uBlock is at an advantage in such case, because since uBlock does not injec - Chromium + uBlock: minimal flickering (sometimes none) - Chromium + ABP: noticeable flickering - Firefox + uBlock: no flickering -- Firefox + ABP: no flickering \ No newline at end of file +- Firefox + ABP: no flickering + +Another advantage of uBlock here is that these collapsed-DOM-counterparts-of-blocked-network-requests are cached as temporary cosmetic filters internally. \ No newline at end of file