prehistoric-systems/uBlock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git synced 2026-03-11 09:04:36 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Updated Static filter syntax (markdown)

Raymond Hill 2018-02-10 07:55:08 -05:00
parent 4d0077bf44
commit 92f753e4c1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Static-filter-syntax.md

@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ By default, the implicit purpose of cosmetic filters is to hide unwanted DOM ele
So mainly it's exactly the same syntax of plain cosmetic filters (i.e. must be a valid CSS selector), except that the `:style(...)` suffix is appended at the end. The content in the parentheses must be one or more [CSS property declarations](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Syntax) (separated by the standard `;`). It is not allowed to use property values with `url(...)`, such `style:`-based cosmetic filters will be discarded.
As with the other new cosmetic filtering selectors, the `:style` can be used only for _specific_ cosmetic filters, i.e. there must be a hostname of entity specified for the filter.
As with the other new cosmetic filtering selectors, the `:style` can be used only for _specific_ cosmetic filters, i.e. there must be a hostname or entity specified for the filter.
Adguard [already support such feature](https://adguard.com/en/filterrules.html#cssInjection), although using a different syntax. However uBO is able to transparently convert and make use of the Adguard's "CSS injection rules" if ever you use an Adguard filter list in uBO (well, this essentially means you can use Adguard's syntax in uBO if you prefer).