From 900e9a475d127389446a92e208602fa0ab8bf0c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: krystian3w <35370833+krystian3w@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:34:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] recover image form commit ~fb2da45
---
Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md b/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
index 3fb29ae..7c6e265 100644
--- a/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
+++ b/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ This page is just a place for me to keep track of comparative memory usage over
- Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8
Before benchmark started:
-
+
After benchmark completed:
-
+
Observations during benchmark:
- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. uBO consistently shows at most low single-digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range.
@@ -39,10 +39,10 @@ Notes:
- Disconnect 5.18.15
Before benchmark started:
-
+
After benchmark completed:
-
+
Observations during benchmark:
- AdBlock is *very* CPU intensive. ABP also, although to a lesser degree compared to AdBlock.