From 8cfc1178f6fc87d4c94d2701ae3bd03e6267e86e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raymond Hill <gorhill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:56:39 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Updated Inline script tag filtering (markdown)

---
 Inline-script-tag-filtering.md | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
index ba89961..536bcd5 100644
--- a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
+++ b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
@@ -106,8 +106,6 @@ Whatever can't be blocked using a network request filter can be taken care by a
 
 No. And apparently, [they won't](https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/748):
 
-> Not quite the same thing - he is "blocking" individual scripts (something that inevitably causes a massive performance overhead). Not that it is significantly more useful as a result, anti-adblock messages can easily be combined with required website functionality in the same <script> tag. They won't do that for a small extension like uBlock but they will definitely do it if we implement something like that.
-
 My comment about this post:
 
 > inevitably causes a massive performance overhead