From 88fc284aff74de273f8b4fbaf129154371f3fda6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gorhill Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:30:45 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Created Contributed memory to web pages (markdown) --- Contributed-memory-to-web-pages.md | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Contributed-memory-to-web-pages.md diff --git a/Contributed-memory-to-web-pages.md b/Contributed-memory-to-web-pages.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..55172b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Contributed-memory-to-web-pages.md @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +Just a place for me to keep track of contributed memory to web pages over time. Using Acid Test 3, a very simple web page, wih embedded `iframes`. Each extension tested alone, with no other extension enabled. Browser left on idle for more than 1 minute to ensure web page memory was garbage collected. + +### 19 September 2014 + +- Chromium 37.0.2062.94 64-bit (Linux) +- µBlock v 0.6.2.1 +- AdBlock 2.7.13 + +No extension (reference):
+![no extension](https://https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-in-page-20140919-none.png) + +Adblock Plus:
+![Adblock Plus](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-in-page-20140919-abp.png) + +µBlock:
+![µBlock](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-in-page-20140919-ublock.png) + +Observations: + +Last time I ran this benchmark [was on Chromium 34 64-bit](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/%C2%B5Block-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared#added-memory-footprint-to-web-pages), and it does appear that Chromium 37 is causing web pages to consume more memory. \ No newline at end of file