From 8324d89d98d26e64845ba39465c091e1f9cf2b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: q1800 <95879668+q1800@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 14:37:02 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Implement uBO naming convention --- Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md b/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md index a953fa1..ed381d3 100644 --- a/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md +++ b/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Just a place for me to keep track of comparative memory usage over time. Screens ### 23 December 2014 - Chromium 39.0.2171.65 64-bit (Linux) -- uBlock 0.8.2.2 +- uBlock Origin (uBO) 0.8.2.2 - AdBlock 2.15 - Adblock Plus 1.8.8 - Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8 @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ After benchmark completed:
![after](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-20141223-after.png) Observations during benchmark: -- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. Whereas uBlock consistently show at most low-single digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range. +- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. Whereas uBO consistently show at most low-single digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range. Settings: -- **uBlock 0.8.2.2**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch). +- **uBO 0.8.2.2**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch). - **AdBlock 2.15**: _AdBlock custom filters_, _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware protection_. - **Adblock Plus 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled. - **Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8**: _English filters_, _Spyware filter_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Social media filter‎_, _Phishing and malware protection_. _Allow acceptable ads_ disabled. @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Notes: ### 18 September 2014 - Chromium 37.0.2062.94 64-bit (Linux) -- uBlock v 0.6.2.1 +- uBO v 0.6.2.1 - AdBlock 2.7.13 - Adblock Plus 1.8.5 - Ghostery 5.4.0 @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Observations during benchmark: - AdBlock is *very* CPU intensive. Adblock Plus also, although to a lesser degree compared to AdBlock. Settings: -- **uBlock v 0.6.2.1**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch). +- **uBO v 0.6.2.1**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch). - **AdBlock 2.7.13**: _AdBlock custom filters_, _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware protection_. - **Adblock Plus 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled. - **Ghostery 5.4.0**: _Blocking all trackers_. Ghostrank not selected. _Alert bubble_ disabled.