From 77f83e17adff3fabac61348b2d468f6dce7f1395 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: iam-py-test <84232764+iam-py-test@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:04:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Dead link

---
 Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md b/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md
index 0d82b45..0e66019 100644
--- a/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md
+++ b/Can-you-trust-uBlock-Origin?.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ I think it's time I give examples of how requiring _less_ permissions is **not**
 
 #### Web Protector - Reliable Phishing Protection
 
-Chrome store: [Web Protector - Reliable Phishing Protection](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/web-protector-reliable-ph/kfecnpmgnlnbmipaogfhoacoioifjgko).
+Chrome store: Web Protector - Reliable Phishing Protection (the extension no longer exists on the Chrome Web Store).
 
 This extension requires the same permission as uBlock, _minus_ the `privacy` one. Some might be inclined that it can thus be more trusted than uBlock, which requires the `privacy` permission.