From 76cebeba8ef7a3ee858905849ba68f3bf69dc723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raymond Hill <gorhill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:57:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Updated Inline script tag filtering (markdown)

---
 Inline-script-tag-filtering.md | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
index 536bcd5..ee71dd4 100644
--- a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
+++ b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
@@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ Whatever can't be blocked using a network request filter can be taken care by a
 
 No. And apparently, [they won't](https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/748):
 
+> Not quite the same thing - he is "blocking" individual scripts (something that inevitably causes a massive performance overhead). Not that it is significantly more useful as a result, anti-adblock messages can easily be combined with required website functionality in the same `<script>` tag. They won't do that for a small extension like uBlock but they will definitely do it if we implement something like that.
+
 My comment about this post:
 
 > inevitably causes a massive performance overhead