From 75884314fd58b092e64aa8f1200da3e7bd5cd8ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 06:56:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Remove internal implementation details, they make no sense to the readers --- Static-filter-syntax.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Static-filter-syntax.md b/Static-filter-syntax.md index 611d471..c1332be 100644 --- a/Static-filter-syntax.md +++ b/Static-filter-syntax.md @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ These HTML filters will cause the elements matching the selectors to be **remove With the introduction of HTML filtering, the `script:contains(...)` is now deprecated and internally converted into an equivalent `##^script:has-text(...)` HTML filter. The result is essentially the same: to prevent the execution of specific inline script tags in a main HTML document. See [_"Inline script tag filtering"_](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Inline-script-tag-filtering) for further documentation. -Support for chaining procedural operators with native CSS selector syntax (i.e. `a:has(b) + c`) was added in [1.20.1b3](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commit/41685f4cce084f3f89e9cdd8fc1cde5b57862958)(`:spath`). Only procedural operators which make sense in the context of HTML filtering are supported. +Support for chaining procedural operators with native CSS selector syntax (i.e. `a:has(b) + c`) was added in [1.20.1b3](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commit/41685f4cce084f3f89e9cdd8fc1cde5b57862958). Only procedural operators which make sense in the context of HTML filtering are supported. ### Scriptlet injection