From 718cd0b43e13c423ff064c3a82c9c98b1b1ecd08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raymond Hill <gorhill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:58:27 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Updated Inline script tag filtering (markdown)

---
 Inline-script-tag-filtering.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
index ee71dd4..ae55df7 100644
--- a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
+++ b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Whatever can't be blocked using a network request filter can be taken care by a
 
 #### Does Adblock Plus support this filter syntax?
 
-No. And apparently, [they won't](https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/748):
+No. And apparently, [they won't](https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/748#comment:9) ("trev" on Adblock Plus issue tracker):
 
 > Not quite the same thing - he is "blocking" individual scripts (something that inevitably causes a massive performance overhead). Not that it is significantly more useful as a result, anti-adblock messages can easily be combined with required website functionality in the same `<script>` tag. They won't do that for a small extension like uBlock but they will definitely do it if we implement something like that.