prehistoric-systems/uBlock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git synced 2026-03-11 09:04:36 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Updated µBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared (markdown)

Raymond Hill 2014-08-25 19:17:33 -07:00
parent d7a07b1bef
commit 67a14359dd
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md

@ -90,7 +90,9 @@ This is the benchmarks comparing CPU usage in the background page when loading [
![CPU benchmark](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/bgpage-cpu-si.comx10.png)
I did measure CPU usage for content scripts (above is background page), but given the web page used for the benchmark is quite a bloated one, the useful figures were drawn in a see of noise. But the fact that ABP inserts 14,000+ CSS rules caused the CPU to used much more than µBlock (3 to 1 ratio). Also, the amount of work µBlock does in its content scripts is proportional to the complexity of a web page. So given µBlock did much better than ABP in its content script for such a bloated web site means it has the right approach to implementing cosmetic filters.
I did measure CPU usage for content scripts (above is background page), but given the web page used for the benchmark is quite a bloated one, the useful figures were drawn in a see of noise. But the fact that ABP inserts 14,000+ CSS rules caused the CPU to used be much more than µBlock (3 to 1 ratio) when comparing content script CPU usage (above is background page CPU usage).
Also, the amount of work µBlock does in its content scripts is proportional to the complexity of a web page. So given µBlock did much better than ABP in its content script for such a bloated web site means it has the right approach to implementing cosmetic filters.
### Related wiki pages