From 4ad56d6f400356685cf91edf512c28a40543c8e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:14:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Updated uBlock vs. uBlock Origin: Facts (markdown) --- uBlock-vs.-uBlock-Origin:-Facts.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/uBlock-vs.-uBlock-Origin:-Facts.md b/uBlock-vs.-uBlock-Origin:-Facts.md index 7ed8657..d701d62 100644 --- a/uBlock-vs.-uBlock-Origin:-Facts.md +++ b/uBlock-vs.-uBlock-Origin:-Facts.md @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Instances: [I see this once in a while] Nonsense. -What makes uBlock efficient is the core filtering engine, which is composed of many parts. The filtering engine was mature at the time of the fork, and aside some refactoring in uBlock Origin to allow the reverse lookup of filter lists, the core filtering engine is essentially the same in both branches, i.e. virtually same performance. +What makes uBlock efficient is the core filtering engine, which is composed of many parts. The filtering engine was mature at the time of the fork, and aside [some refactoring in uBlock Origin](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commit/2234933b82d1c17af42ba574b6515937c7515029#diff-522a16ddeed280252d7c3a351261b441) to fix [issue #58](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/58) and [issue #59](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/59), the core filtering engine is essentially the same in both branches, i.e. virtually same performance. - [uBlock: `static-net-filtering.js`](https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/commits/master/src/js/static-net-filtering.js) vs [uBlock Origin `static-net-filtering.js`](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commits/master/src/js/static-net-filtering.js) - [uBlock: `cosmetic-filtering.js`](https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/commits/master/src/js/cosmetic-filtering.js) vs [uBlock Origin `cosmetic-filtering.js`](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commits/master/src/js/cosmetic-filtering.js)