From 406410158edc4537b6bf75e15a1bec4b71afe9d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:34:34 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20Cosmetic=20filtering=20in=20=C2=B5Blo?= =?UTF-8?q?ck=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- Cosmetic-filtering-in-µBlock.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Cosmetic-filtering-in-µBlock.md b/Cosmetic-filtering-in-µBlock.md index 941fd87..48cf89e 100644 --- a/Cosmetic-filtering-in-µBlock.md +++ b/Cosmetic-filtering-in-µBlock.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ I consider version 0.4.0.0 to be an important milestone for µBlock, hence the jump from 0.3.2.3 to 0.4.0.0. -Contrary to Adblock Plus, µBlock does not inject **all** the generic cosmetic filters into each page and each embedded frames on a page, and this is why pages load faster with µBlock, and this is why the memory footprint of the web pages themselves is significantly smaller with µBlock than with Adblock Plus. +Contrary to Adblock Plus, µBlock does **not** inject **all** the generic cosmetic filters into each page and each embedded frames on a page, and this is why pages load faster with µBlock, and this is why the memory footprint of the web pages themselves is significantly smaller with µBlock than with Adblock Plus. To be able to inject only the cosmetic filters which are relevant to a web page (rather than all of them), µBlock waits for the primary DOM to be available, then survey and collect information on the page to find out which cosmetic filters need to be injected in the page.