From 3ee8eda35292d1f3eb31dafa1381a9b13e654c4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raymond Hill <gorhill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 10:13:51 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Updated Inline script tag filtering (markdown)

---
 Inline-script-tag-filtering.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
index 599d204..69b4a36 100644
--- a/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
+++ b/Inline-script-tag-filtering.md
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Wholesale blocking of inline script tags does prevent the self-defacing, but pos
 
     www.focus.de##script:contains(uabInject)
 
-#### Why is the new script tag filter a cosmetic one?
+#### Why is the new inline script tag filter a cosmetic one?
 
 Because blocking inline script tags is conceptually closer to cosmetic filtering than network filtering: inline script tags are embedded in a web page, so if the web page is downloaded, the inline script tags are downloaded -- there is no way around this.