From 34a027f89320a342cc82d0689401eac35614ec94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gorhill Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 22:14:13 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20Memory=20footprint:=20what=20happens?= =?UTF-8?q?=20inside=20=C2=B5Block=20after=20installation=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- ...-footprint:-what-happens-inside-µBlock-after-installation.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Memory-footprint:-what-happens-inside-µBlock-after-installation.md b/Memory-footprint:-what-happens-inside-µBlock-after-installation.md index 133e730..99cd435 100644 --- a/Memory-footprint:-what-happens-inside-µBlock-after-installation.md +++ b/Memory-footprint:-what-happens-inside-µBlock-after-installation.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ 1. Even after the growth in memory baseline, µBlock's own memory footprint is still quite smaller than that of Adblock Plus -- once the garbage collector does its job. 1. µBlock's much smaller contributed memory footprint to web pages is much smaller than that of ABP - The contributed footprint to web pages is part of the memory footprint of the web pages themselves - - As opposed to µBlock's own memory footprint, visible using Chromium's _"Task Manager"_, the contributed memory footprint to web pages cannot be easily seen by users + - As opposed to an extension's own memory footprint, visible using Chromium's _"Task Manager"_, the contributed memory footprint to web pages cannot be easily seen by users - Though this measure is not readily visible, it's where you get the biggest bang for the buck with µBlock relative to ABP -- because µBlock **does not** inject thousands of CSS rules into pages and embedded frames. Now if you have reach the point where there is a valid µBlock selfie, this is when µBlock will run the most efficiently.