diff --git a/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md b/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md
index f4d6dc8..230d41b 100644
--- a/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md
+++ b/Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB and|or a quad core CPU.md
@@ -13,4 +13,10 @@ Memory and CPU cycles are finite resources. A sure way for a developer to **not*
Not convinced yet? Try [this online tool](http://www.numion.com/StopWatch/index.html) to compare how fast web pages load when using one blocker compared to another.
-First with Adblock Plus. Refresh many times. Notice the result. Then try with µBlock. Refresh many times. **Do you see the difference?**
\ No newline at end of file
+If you have a multi-core CPU, and hence plenty of spare CPU cycles, granted, there may not be such a noticeable difference in page load, but other popular blockers will definitely make use of plenty of whatever spare CPU cycles available (see below) to perform the same job as µBlock.
+
+CPU overhead
+
+
+Memory overhead
+
\ No newline at end of file