From 1ada0e64057c441256fc75a5326a6fa0cd09b918 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:02:09 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Quick guide: popup user interface (markdown) --- Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md b/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md index 6c24643..0b12482 100644 --- a/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md +++ b/Quick-guide:-popup-user-interface.md @@ -98,10 +98,10 @@ In the end the chosen solution is to now have web page themselves subject to fil In the figure above, a user will be given the choice to go back or proceed to the web page which was blocked. If the user choose to proceed, web pages from the site will be temporary allowed for a limited time (currently set at 60s). -If the user disagree that a web page should be blocked (because of a false positive for example), then turning off _strict blocking_ for the site... +If the user disagree that a web page proper should be blocked (because of a false positive for example), then turning off _strict blocking_ for the site... ![Popup UI](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/popup-1h.png) -... will prevent web pages for the site from being blocked by uBlock in the future: the filtering of the site will be done exactly as per ABP-filtering semantic, and just like with uBlock pre-0.9.3.0. +... will prevent web pages proper for the site from being blocked by uBlock in the future: the filtering of the site will be done exactly as per ABP-filtering semantic, and just like with uBlock pre-0.9.3.0. There are many benefits to strict blocking. For example, there is no good reason one should want to connect _at all_ to any of the site present in any one of the malware domain lists. Strict blocking will prevent this from happening. \ No newline at end of file