From 0356b13373d624e762d4608956650bfe5113c635 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:03:08 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Updated=20=C2=B5Block=20vs.=20ABP:=20efficiency?= =?UTF-8?q?=20compared=20(markdown)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md index a346a6a..97194c0 100644 --- a/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md +++ b/µBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared.md @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +[中文](https://github.com/fang5566/uBlock/wiki/%C2%B5Block-%E5%92%8C-ABP-%E5%9C%A8%E8%BF%90%E8%A1%8C%E6%95%88%E7%8E%87%E6%96%B9%E9%9D%A2%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%B9%E6%AF%94)) + +*** + Here is a quick illustrated comparison of efficiency using various angles. Each extension were tested alone, as the only extension present. Benchmarking was performed with Chromium on Linux Mint 64-bit. - [Own memory footprint](#own-memory-footprint)